Skip to main content

Common Traps of Financial Performance Measurement. Are you falling for them?

By
Financial performance measurement helps a company monitor its business health and define a road-map for its future. To properly evaluate this, one should find relevant measures, qualitative as well as quantitative. It is necessary to look beyond this year's budget, adopt the right metrics for measurement and to make sure that the measures are more futuristic and forward looking.

The common traps that professionals tend to fall for while measuring financial performance are;
  • Gaming the metrics - Sometimes, good performance is only on paper and the reality may be quite different. It is difficult to completely avoid the gaming of metrics, as someone who has learned how to doctor a metric without actually having to perform will often do just that. To create an effective system, you have to work with that facts rather than resort to wishful thinking and denial. Gaming the metrics can be minimised by varying the boundaries of measurement.

  • Not benchmarking against the best - While it's necessary to measure yourself against past performance and goals, it is also important to look at how well you are doing against competition. Go beyond your company’s data and gather benchmark data that helps you assess how well you fare against these benchmarks.

  • Not forward looking - While you should look at your historical performance, do not disproportionately delve on it. Bear in mind that historical numbers or estimates are not always indicative of your future performance. It should take into account the business plan for the coming years. While it is important to show sequential improvement in performance, you should look at how current decisions will help you in the coming months. Try to focus on measures that lead, rather than lag revenue and profit.

  • Not reassessing periodically - Numbers are meaningless if they are either not accurate or are not relevant to your goals. It is important to use the right metrics for your business, rather than going with the popular ones. Be precise about what you want to assess and explicit about what metrics are helping you with assessing it.
It's easy to spot the need for change and improvement after things have gone wrong. But can you evaluate your measures before they fail you? The finance function and line function should coordinate in such a way that allows the company to benefit from both the relative independence of the former and the expertise of the latter.

To read similar articles , click here

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Mission to Make the CFO's life Easier

By
In today’s business context, life of a CFO is that of the radar as well as the captain of a moving ship. Today’s CFO is expected to contribute well beyond the traditional role of cost management and operational controls. The CFO needs to play a delicate balancing act across multiple dimensions, some of which include: Impact of globalization: having an effective finance function that can account for the increasing complexities of running a global business Regulatory adherence: Global regulatory requirements are constantly changing and continually increasing, and CFOs have a personal stake in regulatory adherence Risk management: the nature of risks that an organization faces keep changing Reporting requirements: managing the ever broadening and often burdensome reporting requirements The CFO needs to do all this, while also keeping a keen eye on rigorous ongoing cost management and operational efficiencies to fuel profitability and strategic reinvestment. All this under...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why you should automate your statutory financial reporting

By
Visit : https://finalyzer.beyondsquare.com   ||  https://xbrl.beyondsquare.com Statutory reporting consumes a significant amount of time, effort and cost. The statutory reporting function is constantly evolving as organizations look to further streamline their finance function through technology transformation and other cost-cutting initiatives. Manually prepared reports present challenges around data inaccuracy, inconsistency, lack of audit trail. They are time consuming and subject to significant operational risk. If consolidation is involved, there are a whole new set of challenges to deal with – standardisation of account grouping, forex translation, elimination, minority interests etc. Incorrect reporting due to manual errors and omissions can be quite costly. Hundreds of companies are routinely investigated and penalised each year for violating disclosure norms. Organizations are looking at technology solutions to ease out and streamline the regulatory reporting...
Post a Comment
Read more

5 Tips to make your KPI tracking initiatives effective

By
EVERYTHING is measurable in today's increasingly digital world. Clearly, businesses with a strong analytics program in place have significant advantage over those that don't. The right tracking initiatives help them effectively identify what is working and what is not, and to know whether they are making the right decisions . An effective KPI should be able to reflect, and relate directly to the business' goals. It should be quantitative and quantifiable, and linked directly to the measurement of your business' success. So, are you being S.M.A.R.T. about it? When you create KPIs, you should be able to answer these five questions known as the S.M.A.R.T. tips to help you identify the effective ones. ·    1.          Specific : Is this KPI too broad, or is it clearly defined and identified?       2.       Measurable : Can I easily quantify this measure?     3 .      Attainable ...
Post a Comment
Read more