Skip to main content

Common Traps of Financial Performance Measurement. Are you falling for them?

By
Financial performance measurement helps a company monitor its business health and define a road-map for its future. To properly evaluate this, one should find relevant measures, qualitative as well as quantitative. It is necessary to look beyond this year's budget, adopt the right metrics for measurement and to make sure that the measures are more futuristic and forward looking.

The common traps that professionals tend to fall for while measuring financial performance are;
  • Gaming the metrics - Sometimes, good performance is only on paper and the reality may be quite different. It is difficult to completely avoid the gaming of metrics, as someone who has learned how to doctor a metric without actually having to perform will often do just that. To create an effective system, you have to work with that facts rather than resort to wishful thinking and denial. Gaming the metrics can be minimised by varying the boundaries of measurement.

  • Not benchmarking against the best - While it's necessary to measure yourself against past performance and goals, it is also important to look at how well you are doing against competition. Go beyond your company’s data and gather benchmark data that helps you assess how well you fare against these benchmarks.

  • Not forward looking - While you should look at your historical performance, do not disproportionately delve on it. Bear in mind that historical numbers or estimates are not always indicative of your future performance. It should take into account the business plan for the coming years. While it is important to show sequential improvement in performance, you should look at how current decisions will help you in the coming months. Try to focus on measures that lead, rather than lag revenue and profit.

  • Not reassessing periodically - Numbers are meaningless if they are either not accurate or are not relevant to your goals. It is important to use the right metrics for your business, rather than going with the popular ones. Be precise about what you want to assess and explicit about what metrics are helping you with assessing it.
It's easy to spot the need for change and improvement after things have gone wrong. But can you evaluate your measures before they fail you? The finance function and line function should coordinate in such a way that allows the company to benefit from both the relative independence of the former and the expertise of the latter.

To read similar articles , click here

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Mission to Make the CFO's life Easier

By
In today’s business context, life of a CFO is that of the radar as well as the captain of a moving ship. Today’s CFO is expected to contribute well beyond the traditional role of cost management and operational controls. The CFO needs to play a delicate balancing act across multiple dimensions, some of which include: Impact of globalization: having an effective finance function that can account for the increasing complexities of running a global business Regulatory adherence: Global regulatory requirements are constantly changing and continually increasing, and CFOs have a personal stake in regulatory adherence Risk management: the nature of risks that an organization faces keep changing Reporting requirements: managing the ever broadening and often burdensome reporting requirements The CFO needs to do all this, while also keeping a keen eye on rigorous ongoing cost management and operational efficiencies to fuel profitability and strategic reinvestment. All this under...
Post a Comment
Read more

5 Things to Consider Before Investing in a Financial Consolidation Software

By
  In a recent conversation, the Chief Accounting Officer of India’s largest private enterprise mentioned that a good financial consolidation software would be of great service to the accounting community. His statement implying indirectly that in his many years of managing accounting for an extraordinarily large and complex organisation, he has still not come across a suitable enterprise platform for consolidation. It is but natural to assume that organizations would rid themselves of long days of manual financial consolidation and labour-intensive management and statutory reporting. The practice of being strapped to one’s chair and spending long hours into these activities must be shunned. Instead, quality time should be spent on analysis and decision making. Before you dive in to avail the perks of a financial consolidation software, it is crucial to know what to expect from the software. While there are many choices, one must exercise prudence in selecting the one that furth...
Post a Comment
Read more

Getting out of Excel Hell!

By
…and why you should automate your management financial reporting. Excel is one of the world’s greatest desktop tools and many people love it because it is familiar and easy to operate. If you want to analyze a lot of numbers or do some complex modelling on a static dataset, it's hard to beat.I personally am a power user of excel and love the flexibility and ability to model various scenarios easily, and then analyse it. However, running a company involves collaborative, multi-department processes like planning, budgeting, forecasting, and reporting. It involves collating data from multiple source systems and people, curating & transforming it before it is ready for consumption. And that’s where the power of Excel falls short. Weeks are wasted every year, manually consolidating a mass of individual spreadsheets. Errors in cross-linkages, formulae getting converted to hard-coded numbers, manual errors, manual data entry, individuals having to laboriously search their computer...
Post a Comment
Read more